| Thread (62 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Tjommis 11/25/08 7:50:14 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 10/12/08 |
Originally posted by Scaredgirl
Lol, "company policy".. If AoC suddenly had 1 million subscriptions, you think we wouldn't see EE doing videos and interview every day boasting with their numbers? Give me a break. You are being very naive my friend. Were you here at launch when EE and others were telling us how AoC sold over 750k boxes? They talked about their sub numbers then, ignoring their holy "company policy", what has changed? I'll tell you what has changed - 90% of those players quit. The only reason why any MMO developer would be quiet about their numbers is because those numbers SUCK. Look at Blizzard. They are not quiet. Why should they be, they have 11 million subs. If AoC had 11 million subs, EE would be running around naked on the streets of Oslo shouting this news to everyone. You talk about AoC players not using Xfire because they are older bla bla.. How do you know this? How do you know AoC players don't use as much Xfire as for example WoW players? You don't know. You are only speculating. What we do know is that at the same time AoC started to lose players, Xfire numbers went down even faster than FC stock. Xfire numbers went down 90%+ You think this is coincidence? You think it was only those Xfire players that didn't like AoC? Last but not least.. this "steady increase of players" you have been seeing is probably just people switching servers. Why don't you go to a less populated server and make a new character? You can play this fun minigame where you see how many levels you can get before you see another human player. I think you could easily go for level 40+.
1. Yeah, it is their company policy. I'm just stating it as it is and has been with FC over the years. No more. Your speculation about why that is so, is yours, allthough in my opinion this has hurt the company more than they have gained by it. 2. The reason I said the players seem to be older is based on two things. My own experience ingame never having heard about a single person using this program, combined with the polls being held at the forums showing these signs. Ofcourse this is not bullet proof data, but it fits with X-fire not being a good predictor for the Q3 results. That's it. Atleast it is backed up by something and not pure speculation; which is a label you seem to easily place on others. |
|
| |
||
|
Scaredgirl 11/25/08 8:11:22 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 11/18/08 |
Originally posted by Tjommis
1. Did you look at the link arkady09 posted above you? So much for your precious company policy. 2. Let me guess.. nobody in your guild is using Xfire? I know the concept of statistics might sound scary and difficult to understand but the fact is, statistics work. When they do and election poll, do you think they interview millions of people? No, they don't have to, it still works. The fact that you, your friends and or your mailman has ever used Xfire, doesn't mean ANYTHING. There ARE people who use it and they are not some weird crazy Xfire people. They are regular gamers like you and me. Young, old, big, small, smart or dumb. Welcome to the world of statistics! Personally I trust Xfire 1000 times more than a Q3 report made by unethical management of FC with "mystery 6 million". I think people who use this particular AoC Q3 report to estimate subscription numbers are crazy in the head. |
|
| ----------------------------- |
||
|
7Fold 11/27/08 2:19:07 AM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 4/16/04
Achiever 40.00%, Explorer 13.33%, Killer 100.00%, Socializer 46.67% |
Originally posted by Teran1987
You know review sites are made for this reason alone. Read a few reviews see what they say they can't all be wrong. Does Burger King let you try out the Hamburger before you buy it |
|
| |
||
|
Scaredgirl 11/27/08 4:20:57 AM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 11/18/08 |
Originally posted by 7Fold
Actually most of them are. What happened with AoC reviews was that the people who reviewed AoC, did it right before launch after playing only for a couple of days. Most reviewers didn't even finish Tortage and they wrote the review only seeing a small part of AoC. We all know AoC changes a lot after Tortage. If you read AoC reviews I recommend you look at the date it was written. Most recent review of AoC was made by Eurogamer. It's was actually a re-review where they changed AoC score from 8/10(?) to 6/10.
|
|
| ----------------------------- |
||
|
Ngeldu5t 11/27/08 6:16:29 AM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 10/14/05
Awaiting for a skill base game with consequences. |
This is what IGN and Game trailer said about a month after the game was released. www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU1oPqxye0s www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL1V1AUUZ8U&feature=related I don't understand how people missed these reviews! I decided not to play after the so called OB then waited for 6 months and now I`m giving it a try. Don`t tell me those who were in CB did not know the State of the Game before release and yet they chose to pre-order the game. If there is someone to blame,players should blame themselves for pre-ordering CE/ rushing on every single MMO released and then they whine for missing content
|
|
| |
||
|
Vespers 11/27/08 7:33:44 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 6/12/06 |
Actually, I was in AoC Closed Beta for quite awhile and I can tell you right now that and overall majority of Closed Beta testers absolutely knew that the state of the game at Launch was going to be horrible. There were numerous post on the Beta forums begging FC to not launch the game because of all of the problems it was having. |
|
| |
||
|
Ngeldu5t 11/27/08 7:48:06 AM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 10/14/05
Awaiting for a skill base game with consequences. |
Originally posted by Vespers Thank you for the clarification. |
|
| |
||
|
Lydon 11/27/08 7:55:52 AM
|
||
|
| ||