| Thread (38 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
severius 10/08/08 3:01:53 AM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 8/10/04 |
To be perfectly fair, with the amount of fun that I have been having in war lately, probably would have never even paid attention to this one's release. Now, at least, I will give it a try. Free is good, yes, very very good. |
|
|
Delanor 10/08/08 6:25:34 AM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 8/28/06 |
Originally posted by MarlonB
I think gold will be worth very little in this game .... there is very little to spend it on. There for it remains to be seen if it will be a problem. That is what I always thought, until someone mentioned the possiblity of spamming for other games in Spellborn. |
|
| -- |
||
|
Delanor 10/08/08 6:30:41 AM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 8/28/06 |
Originally posted by severius Is that wise? You run the risk of having to play a better game than WAR. Better not touch it. |
|
| -- |
||
|
3on1 10/08/08 6:32:46 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/23/07 |
Originally posted by severius
but it wont be f2p, it will have a free starter area, the rest will be p2p =) http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/207/view/news/read/11817 |
|
| |
||
|
Scriar 10/08/08 7:36:49 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 5/31/07 |
Apparently they are going to have 3 free months for you to play the game though. So theres plenty of time for people to decide if they want to play the game long term or not. |
|
|
|
||
|
MarlonB 10/08/08 7:49:29 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 4/11/06 |
Originally posted by Delanor
Hmm ... indeed ... valid point :) |
|
| |
||
|
satojin 10/21/08 9:36:47 AM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 6/13/06 |
There are too many games coming out for them not to offer a f2p "trial" bit to their game. People are getting sick of paying for a new MMORPG just to have it be another EQ1 clone. |
|
| |
||
|
Consequence 10/21/08 11:49:38 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 7/29/04 |
For the life of me, I cannot think of ANYTHING bad about this. So the makers feel confident enough in their game that they are willing to let it sell itself. They aren't promising the world, only for you to get angry and dissapointed when in fact they dont deliver. You play it, if you like it, you pay for it. If you dont, buh-bye. Too many of you are just whining for the sake of whining. |
|
| |
||
|
alessiora 10/21/08 3:19:29 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/22/06 |
Originally posted by Consequence Agree!!! |
|
| |
||
|
Trucidation 10/22/08 3:24:47 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 5/05/04
/i/nsurgent |
I don't "get" the whining either... most of the complaints seem to be that f2p means gold spammers will start cluttering the newbie areas. Boo hoo? That just screams for more admin / GM involvement... I hate all these companies which basically just abandon their servers to spammers and botters. Acclaim can surely afford to devote a person or two to go around stomping them out. In shifts (remember many of these could be azn sweatshop "gamers"). As repetitive jobs go, it's a darn sight more cushy than, say, menial labouring work. - Can't be about money either. I've played a couple of fp2 games: on average, people spend WAY MORE in those games compared to subscriptions. In one game alone, upgrading one item to the "best" levels costs on average USD$300. You don't notice since you do it over time. That's easily 20 months' worth of $15 subscriptions, close to two years. That's just ONE item. On AVERAGE. Players have admitted to spending way more, thousands even. If I were a publisher I'd be freaking demanding f2p. The minor costs of hiring a couple of goons to remove spammers from the game would be inconsequential in comparison. Hell, throw in a "report this person because he's (1) a bot (2) spamming" option, and you'd literally have the players doing most of the work for you. It's pathetic how most MMOs don't even have as basic a function as that. |
|
| - |
||