All Posts by Leucent

Testing it, and it s ready get over it. Stop trying to make WAR look bad because your game failed or is failing.

Originally posted by kegtap

Originally posted by tikovoo

Originally posted by Draccan

Cutting four of six capitols is LAZY.

All the hype has gone now...

D.

 

 

 

pretty much sums up the attitude on a lot of forums from the fans.

either

a)  lazy - (lacks ability to fix something broken)

b) EA needs some money - quicker (sooner release)

 

They put the hearts time and money into a game and you say lazy?  lol
 

You think any of the poeple that make MMO's work a normal 8 hour shift?

Hes a WAR troll ignore him he ll go away.

I completely agree with it and love it. It focuses the fight to large fights not all over the place. I can tell you it will be better.

Originally posted by Ascension08

I don't know, I keep hearing how fun WAR is even from people who get their hands on it for 15 min at Gamesday conventions and stuff. It feels similar to WoW as in UI and combat (to a certain extent) but it's in a different, more complex, dark, twistedly funny, and brutal world...

But I know alot of people love wasting their lives raiding.

Don t worry they re not alike in the least, NDA stops me from saying much more ;)

Originally posted by altairzq

Originally posted by Celestian

 

---

Originally posted by altairzq
Honesty is not an excuse for bad planning. If they are having these problems now so close to open beta, it's very bad news.
And Mark Jacobs is an arrogant person.

---

 

Problems? They are delaying content. How is that a problem. WoW delayed hero classes and siege warfare ... 4+ years and when they add it they are just adding a single hero class and hopefully siege warfare. God forbid Warhammer does half as well as WoW.

Want to talk bad planning, WoW... 2 years for an expansion, seriously? Again look how it's affected WoW... uh 10 million subscribers... damn must be terrible.

It's better to have working and fun content than AoCish content. If you don't agree then well you're in the minority there.

If it bothers you so much then just wait till the 4 classes and cities exist and create your own "delay".

I don't think it's just "content" the problem. Why? because it's too big a thing, they would have realiized months ago that they cound't do 6 cities. I could understand they taking out a feature or two from all the cities, or maybe 2 cites, but 4 cities out of 6? How could they fail to plan that amount of workload?

And then there is also the issue about doubling the content in every city. So it's llike 4 cities? Why not leave 4 cities as planed?

Not to alk about the testing of the conflic rotating between cities, when they will be available. Odd.

I  think the answer is that something is not working as intended in the game mechanics, and they have been forced to change it, but only have the time to fix two cities. So maybe, it's not about content, but about fixing things, and it's very late to start doing such things now.

Question altairzq are you beta testing the game atm?

Wow get a grip people it s a game. It s a good game that they decided to take some things out. Is your life changing because of it. The game works as intended as is and will just get better. Calm down, take a deep breath and maybe get some sun. Amazing so stirred up over a game.

Lol is alli have to say.

Everything is fine. People will moan and groan and considering some people can t read and need things explained i thank you for spelling it out for them. If WAR had say 10-12 classes and they took out 2-3 then ya thats big but 1/6th big deal. The cities are not a big thing they ll be added and finished, so release will be met. I personally don t care if they re ever put in because a 3 front battle for 1 city each means more concentrated battles, thats funner to me.

Lol i m so amazed at how this effects peoples lives so much. The game is good, the game will be good, things will be released in time. Now if they delayed people would be freaking out. If they didn t tell us and you went into an incomplete city people would freak out. If you made a choppa(which i was going to make but have 19 other classes to choose from so big f n deal) and it was gimped or not complete people would freak. They came out and told us, thats great from a company. Everything will be fine just relax and take a deep breath and realize it s a game.

Originally posted by JustBe

Originally posted by Leucent

Originally posted by JustBe

I played the game the other month and it has a horrible UI with bad character movement and everywhere was dead, the problem with these old mmorpgs is theres never anyone playing at low level. The flaw of the level systme on the whole really because whenever I'd go back to SWG or now playing EVE Online which is also old, you always can group with players and always people around. However I went back to EQ2 and the game was just dead, I couldn't get a level 30 group and just thought to myself how I don't want to play alone, even if you have mate splaying they're higher level. I also found the combat of DAOc really slow and horrible and people jsut stand still why slicking attacks, why I think WOW's PVP is ALOT better than all these other mmorpgs is because it doesn't have auto facing and you can run behind the caster so it cancels his spell and try to dodge attacks.

To me EVE and WOW have by far the best PVP out there when it comes to Mechanics, all this RVR stuff is just faction v faction and WOw has that in form of battlegrounds and I see no difference other than seige weapons which is coming in the next expansion.

 

Oh my comparing WOW FvF and DAOC RvR is blasphemy. Sure WOW has BG s but the new x pac still doesn t display what DAOC has and what WAR will have. It s restricted to a zone that really doesn t have an overall effect on the world. It s not the same, as a matter of fact it s not even close.

 

The effects on the world get old after the first time because they ain't dynamic like say EVE it's just the same old crap each time.

I disagree. The way DAOC s keeps changed hands , DF would change hands it was fun IMO. I really can t see how anyone can compare WOW s FvF to anything mythic is or has made.
 

Originally posted by JustBe

I played the game the other month and it has a horrible UI with bad character movement and everywhere was dead, the problem with these old mmorpgs is theres never anyone playing at low level. The flaw of the level systme on the whole really because whenever I'd go back to SWG or now playing EVE Online which is also old, you always can group with players and always people around. However I went back to EQ2 and the game was just dead, I couldn't get a level 30 group and just thought to myself how I don't want to play alone, even if you have mate splaying they're higher level. I also found the combat of DAOc really slow and horrible and people jsut stand still why slicking attacks, why I think WOW's PVP is ALOT better than all these other mmorpgs is because it doesn't have auto facing and you can run behind the caster so it cancels his spell and try to dodge attacks.

To me EVE and WOW have by far the best PVP out there when it comes to Mechanics, all this RVR stuff is just faction v faction and WOw has that in form of battlegrounds and I see no difference other than seige weapons which is coming in the next expansion.

Oh my comparing WOW FvF and DAOC RvR is blasphemy. Sure WOW has BG s but the new x pac still doesn t display what DAOC has and what WAR will have. It s restricted to a zone that really doesn t have an overall effect on the world. It s not the same, as a matter of fact it s not even close.

Originally posted by Wolfenpride

Dark age of camelot had the best pvp hands down imo.

No game has come even close since then.

I would still play it if the player base was as large as it was before ToA, but sadly its time has passed for alot of people. :(

Bang on, i think the Origins server will be hugely popular at first then sit a little higher then all the other clusters for a long time. Sadly though i really miss the old pre TOA days, damn they were fun times.
 

wow they sure are.

Yes it s true a grp of 20 s can take a 40 np. As you can see in the scenarios they have a large level gap of players able to join, so yes it will happen :) I know alot of people will be all upset they can t take down a grp by themselves but i m happy about it.

Not worried in the least, i think they re just catering to an even larger crowd. I ll be buying it, nothing better then a game thats free to go along with one thats P2P as i will be in WAR. Can t beat that combo :)

I picked Core, simply because when i want to RVR i will , when i don t i don t :) O like to be able to do my own thing from time to time and in WAR if i really want to rvr there is alot of it around, it s not like it will be hard to find. I really do want to enjoy all the aspects of the game and don t want to be pestered while i m doing the pve parts of it. I do understand why people would go Open as i ve played games like that and really do love it, but my wife is playing with me and well she s the boss:) In reality i do want to pick when i rvr or not .

Im still going with an October release. The game is in great shape now, of course the guild testing could find problems no one knows but i m sticking with October.

I get a feeling you won t leave it at that.