Profile: Bonemane
Send PM  Forum Posts  Forum Topics 

Recent Forum Posts [more...]

• • Guild "FOXHOUND" Recruiting

  • New Guild FOXHOUND Looking for Metal Gear Solid lovers. If you don't know what any of that means then don't bother.

    PM Mercy_Slayer in-game on Heaven's Tear server to get an invite.

  • Posted: 11/26/08 12:34 AM
    Perfect World
• • Perfect example of my Solo vs grouping issue

  • Originally posted by Cibaj
    

    You ignored my post where I indicated that dungeons in WoW are tuned for 5 people.

    It's hard to take someone seriously when they choose which posts to respond to in order to reinforce their position, rather than responding to all serious replies.

     

    Don't even bother to respond to this guy. He ignores all fact and common sense to reinforce his position and then when he's wrongs he relies on childish comments just to get his way. Hahaha english not my first language? Look at the way I type then look at him its obviously he's just once again turning to another subject because he's backed into a corner. And didn't I say he would respond with a totally off topic subject first? I can read this guy like a book (how ironic) and he's so predictable.

    I mean look at his responses he completely blows pass things I directly commented on and acts as if I'm the one that "turned a blind eye". He has no common sense, he gets everything from a book and takes its literal meaning instead of going in depth or atleast trying to see how it associates with the subject at hand.

    Anyone wonder why noone is defending him? Its not because he's acting like a complete jackass, but in his post about what him and his wife were doing he says something very important that completely destroys his arguement and he has yet to realise it.

  • Posted: 11/24/08 5:32 PM
    General Discussion
• • Perfect example of my Solo vs grouping issue

  • Originally posted by Ravanos
    

    Originally posted by Bonemane
    

     so you're saying that the dictionary is a lie? that two or more people don't make a group? do you have your own dictionary and is your more highly published that it can be stated as truth more so than the one that definition is from?

    but since you asked .... i did, but not as a definition ... i looked up Pair in the Thesaurus online and its amazing what i found.

    PAIR:

    Synonyms: brace, combination, combine, combo, couple, deuce, doublet, duality, duo, dyad, match, mates, span, team, twins, two, two of a kind, twosome, yoke.

    now look at that little word underlined, i bet you can't guess what a synonym of Team is?

    You found one SYNONYM out of what 20 and took it literally? Seriously, how foolish are you? They're talking team as in a 2 person team (think Batman and Robin) which is why its associated with PAIR in the first place. Common sense. Something which you clearly lack of.

    whats so hard to "learn", a Duo killing same level elite mobs get less exp than a soloer in the same amount of time. maybe you should learn reading comprehension? or are we going back to your wonderful duo does not equal a group theory which was already blow out of the water in my last two posts.

    What's so hard to learn? You posted about something which you know nothing about and should've learned your lesson by the posts in this thread. You didn't "blow" anything out of the water. A few people who posted already agree and have said that duo is not a very good group or shouldn't have even been considered one or be compared with grouping. So you gonna keep going with that poor excuse of a duo (if you consider yourself knowledgeable and knew what you were doing, then I hate to see the guy you paired up with) as a reason that groups should get more xp?

    Heck, even Blizzard doesn't consider a duo a group since 3 or more gets the bonus lol. In this case we're talking in terms of MMORPGs or MMOs in general and a duo won't cut it, that's why there's things like oh idk the "HOLY TRINITY".

    yes i have gotten to the max endgame and love to raid ... although if you actually read and comprehended my post I never stated which game. in EQ2 i have 3 level 80 characters that have completeled all the (pre TSO) raid content.

    if you read any of my other posts I despise WOW and have quit since that post, even though my wife does play it. even playing with her and friends could not spare me from the crap that is WoW.

    and yes i have experienced the whole Raider vs Casual out on the PVP battlefield where the raider destroys the casual soloer and the soloer in turns runs to the forum and cries his little eyes out about how life sucks and it isn't fair he pays the same subscription price why shouldn't he be able to win.

    Comprehend? If I can comprehend your vague, senseless posts (which I can) then I consider myself able to apply to Harvard for a professor position. Just from the fact that I looked at your vague post about raiding and considered 2 games, EQ2 or WoW, and went with the latter means I comprehended it genius. Where did I say that you still play WoW? Again it is YOU that is reading things that aren't there (or putting them in there) just for the sake of argument because you have completely NOTHING to say. Fact is your thread failed to deliver because you failed at being knowledgable of the game you were playing.

    If I wouldn't have posted in this thread it would have died a day or so after it was created. Just some more cargo on the fail train. Yeah, point is I wouldn't throw around the word fail if the thread I'm posting in was a failed thread that I, myself created. Oh and how good did you set yourself up by posting the definition of fail, its as if you totally forgot the first 2 pages.

    Oh let me guess what your next post will consist of:

    First you're gonna say something off topic once again. Then, you're gonna come with a personal attack. Last, after you have nothing else to say (something which your posts scream) you're gonna pass me off as dumb and my posts complete jibberish.

    
     

     

     

  • Posted: 11/24/08 5:23 AM
    General Discussion
• • Perfect example of my Solo vs grouping issue

  • Originally posted by Ravanos
    

    Originally posted by Bonemane
    

    Originally posted by matthewf978
    

    Without a doubt, group xp should receive a bonus. One would think that the game developer would want to implement bonus even if only for the purpose of encouraging multi-playing(multiple subscriptions/boxing). I am guided by the concept of xping should be easy even if solo, but even easier if grouped. It is silly that a duo group is earning so much less than a solo'er. Choice of class isn't relevant, all classes should be able to earn xp equally(depending on how busy the person is with their fingers and hotbuttons).

     

    Did you ever think that maybe a "duo" isn't really a group? or that xping IS easier if you're in a group?

    
     

    LOL ... here you go buddy the definition of a GROUP

    group (grp) KEY

    NOUN:

    An assemblage of persons or objects gathered or located together; an aggregation: a group of dinner guests; a group of buildings near the road.
    Two or more figures that make up a unit or design.
    

    well holy crap look at that!

    another definition for you

    fail(fl) KEY

    VERB:
    failed , fail·ing , fails
     

    To prove deficient or lacking; perform ineffectively or inadequately: failed to fulfill their promises; failed in their attempt to reach the summit.
    To be unsuccessful: an experiment that failed.
    To receive an academic grade below the acceptable minimum.
    To prove insufficient in quantity or duration; give out: The water supply failed during the drought.
    To decline, as in strength or effectiveness: The patient's heart began to fail.
    To cease functioning properly: The engine failed.
    To give way or be made otherwise useless as a result of excessive strain: The rusted girders failed and caused the bridge to collapse. 
     Bonemane

    ok i added the last one but really your name should definatley be under its definition.

     

    Hahaha good one. You might wanna look up pair as well.

    You also might wanna put your thread under fail as well, seeing how 80% of the people who posted agree with me in some form or another. Honestly if the issue of grouping has you as its leader I'm afraid hope is lost. You might wanna learn how to play a game before you use it as an example to further your cause. Just a little tip incase you decide to make another thread about group vs solo ;)

    And seeker I didn't miss the point or "spoon up the drivel". He has no point. He didn't know how to play the game nor any of its features. As soon as people started posting in this thread his "cries" were pounded into oblivion. Which is why he focuses on me instead of the topic because he failed on so many levels. I'm guessing you missed my first post too since I basically stripped down grouping and solo and spoon fed him the details.

    Back to Ravanos. You lie and over exaggerate to prove things. Didn't in another thread you say you got to max level and did endgame raids? Now you say you only got to level 25...weird...claiming you were glad groupers/raiders got better items so you could "dominate" solo players in pvp. Which not only contradicts the point you tried to make in this thread about groupers not having it better than soloers, but also proves you lie since most likely you only heard about most of the things you say.

  • Posted: 11/23/08 11:25 PM
    General Discussion
• • Great Game BUT

  • Originally posted by Pepsipwnzgod
    

    Like so many of the old timed games it just wont match up anymore, they were built for the small community of fresh out of college pale faced pimpled out kids that had a bunch of people in their basement screaming "for frodo" while playing the game, but they cant match not only...

     

    The quality of graphics that are needed to keep the attention of the ADD blistered children of today's day and age

    The servers cant hold the amount of people that would play if the other req was up to par

    And the abuse-ability ( ill elaborate)

    It takes around an hour to hit max level with a high enough mage running around power leveling you, the botting is non-stop, even gamers that consider themselves legit bot, beleive it or not people sell game for this game still, and the stat hacks are rediculous..

    Now i know adapting things from other games seems to be non-stop insulted but install a virus protecter ( this is directed to who ever runs knight *if anyone* ) put in a spam filter and make experience decrease depending on whoever is in the party..

     

    The quests in this game are amazing

    The pvp is so hard it's fun

    It STILL has potential... just update the graphics and.. do all the other stuff..

     

    I'd probably play if the servers wernt constantly full lol.. regardless of bots and such-what

    Some parts confused me. When you say it takes around an hour to get to max level. Were you the one getting power leveled by chance?

     And who would want to play with the ADD blistered children of today anyway? Jeezuz you get enough of them on WoW. You must be some sort of pedo -_- Someone call the cops!

  • Posted: 11/23/08 5:46 PM
    Knight Online