| Username | saint4God |
| Real Name | |
| Rank | Hard Core Member |
| Joined | July 9, 2007 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | (hidden) |
| Location | N/A, DE, United States |
| Last Visit | November 21, 2008 |
| Post Count | 569 |
| Biography | |
| Quote |
With both games having their expansions out, I wonder who came out with better results.
![]()
Originally posted by donjn
Brutal Thread Necro by the way.
Hehe, and you're helping ^_^
I think the big difference here is volume. Blizz has had the same 1 game out since 2004-ish and still going very strong. Still selling, still monthly subscriptions. Nintendo had to keep cranking out new and different games (and consoles) to renew interests. I don't have satistical comparison, but they're the biggest boatload of monthly income I know of historically.
I have to say my first landing in Borean Tundra was a bit anti-climactic, thinking it was a re-vamp of more of the same. Blue kobolds? Seriously? But I got word last night that 70's could get to Howling Fjord from Menethil Harbour and figured "what the hey". MUCH BETTER! The giants are about twice the size of my human, which makes so much more sense than stupidly sky-high foes. The attack on the north part of the town was fun and didn't seemed like a theatrical play where everyone goes through the motions of a script. Overall the landscape was much more cohesive and interesting to look at, a consistent cohesive whole whereas Borean looked more like a playground with different groups of kids playing different games. Good times, and queues are looking a lot more normal without the wait times. The shadow of the dragon flying overhead had me jump. The more I play, the more I appreciate the shading, higher detail and shadows.
Originally posted by Kordesh
A fool and his money...
and Blizzard found themselves a town of exiled court jesters.
Oh but how much fun it is to a fool be!
